![]() ![]() ![]() Adobe (Nasdaq:ADBE) today announcedAdobe ColdFusion 11 Enterprise Edition, an all-in-one application server that offers developers a single platform to rapidly build and deploy scalable, high-performing web and mobile applications in enterprise environments. New Features Leverage Developer Skills to Speed Up Mobile App Development, Increase Security in Enterprise Environments Lees het volledige, Engelstalige persbericht hieronder:Īdobe Announces ColdFusion 11 for Rapid Web and Mobile Enterprise App Development Tevens kunnen ontwikkelaars met ColdFusion 11 Enterprise pdf-bestanden van hoge kwaliteit creëren en bewerken en biedt het platform verschillende security-opties, zoals veilige profielen en standaard server-vergrendeling. Adobe ColdFusion 11 bevat nieuwe features die het oplossen van software-fouten, het ontwikkelen, het testen en het lanceren van mobiele applicaties versnellen. Deze complete applicatieserver biedt ontwikkelaars een enkel platform waarop zij snel schaalbare applicaties voor het web en mobiel kunnen bouwen en inzetten binnen bedrijfsomgevingen. ![]() If they don’t notice that the TRIAL is instead (always, for now) running as ENTERPRISE, they may think that the upgrade from the older to the newer version is giving them benefits which they would then LOSE when they then put in their Standard license key.Adobe (Nasdaq:ADBE) heeft Adobe ColdFusion 11 Enterprise Edition aangekondigd. So again, the request here is to specifically offer an option at install time (or via the admin after the fact, also) to choose to make it that the Developer edition runs with Standard features, rather than Enterprise ones, if desired.Īnd now that you mention it, the same request COULD be made regarding one running the TRIAL edition as well: someone may know that they are running the trial in anticipation of upgrading from an older CF Standard edition, to this newer Standard edition. If you mean that you’d ask the dev team to “mention in the CF Admin” when *some feature* was Enterprise-only, that is not what we were talking about (and it’s not enough).įor instance, there are language features (not only admin features) which are affected by whether one is running Std vs Enterprise. Priyank, I’m not sure if you’re proposing the solution I am suggesting. Plus there’s a little bit more of a financial disparity in the SQL versions. It seems a little less impactful, though, because there is a much clearer delineation of what is a MSSQL Enterprise Feature and what isn’t (like Transparent Data Encryption and Always Encrypted). It seems to me that this would be a good pain point to remove from developers.Īnd Charlie, I think I might look at the SQL Developer differences. But with my above progression, I’d be much more likely to just change the functionality or remove it entirely if I can’t find a work-around. In my hypothetical here, I would have been more likely to buy the Enterprise Edition up front if I had known that functionality that I wanted was an EE feature. It fails after I deploy to Production, and I spend a bit of time figuring out why.I test my Advanced Scheduling feature locally in Developer Edition, not realizing it’s Enterprise.My initial intention is to run my site from Standard Edition, because I don’t anticipate any Enterprise functionality. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |